October 2018 Marijuana Critic Canada posted in Qualitative Analysis that he had perhaps erroneously reported that the high percentage of THC reported by laboratories contemporaneously differed with USDA Analysis.
( Maybe the " low percentage opinion '' is not so wrong after all, there is now new lower percentage analysis reported by Health Canada Approved laboratories in 2019 in BC.)
In my previously published Blog Posts, I wrote that I had deduced that all THC of several types and some available in the future was being reported as present in modern Analysis and the USDA or DEA had not reported analysis this way.
November 15 2015 Blog Post is the original Critic lower THC percentage opinion where modern analysis percentages seemed to be high which was exciting for sales and alarmists as well.
Claims that Marijuana is way stronger and thus dangerous are based in part upon this discrepancy in Analysis Reporting Methodology.
I know this old scoffer who would like to have authors think that the dreams of Cartoon Caricatures are dangerous enough to be monitored by Police. Hiss Hiss. Strong Marijuana from an Economist's viewpoint is not dangerous but efficent as smoking or vaping less has to be better.
ReplyDeleteSunday November 15 2015 is the Original Post for Low Percentage Opinion on Marijuana Critic Canada. Analysis was being reported differently than in the Past and as reported by USDA or DEA Laboratories the Post claims. Now Analysis is being offered which reports low THC analysis in Canada by an approved Laboratory.
ReplyDelete